Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:23

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
People are just learning of the most deadly disease that often goes undiagnosed by doctors - UNILAD
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
The $5 trillion company: Wall Street got more bullish on tech stocks this week - MarketWatch
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Thank you.
Android 16 review: Post-hype - Ars Technica
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Have Dakota Johnson and Chris Martin Consciously Uncoupled? - The Cut
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.